Fifty Shades Darker

Fifty Shades Darker

Blu-ray Disc - 2017
Average Rating:
12
1
Rate this:
Anastasia has broken off her relationship with the troubled Christian to pursue a new career in a Seattle publishing house. While Christian wrestles with his inner demons, Anastasia must confront the anger and envy of the women who came before her. Includes Theatrical and Unrated versions of the film.
Publisher: Universal City, California : Universal Pictures Home Entertainment, [2017]
Edition: Unrated edition Édition intégrale
Branch Call Number: BLU FIF
Characteristics: video file,Blu-ray,1080p high definition,region A
digital,optical,surround,DTS-X,5.1 DTS digital
1 videodisc (132 min.) : sound, color ; 4 3/4 in

Opinion

From the critics


Community Activity

Comment

Add a Comment

d
danomcd
Aug 30, 2017

What a total waste of time. I honestly don't understand what the hype was around this movie. Was it cutting edge and pushing boundaries??? NOT AT ALL - maybe if you are extremely conservative but in general it is a run of the mill "B" class movie. A controlling man with a soft speaking woman both of whom have zero character development and you could care less about the story.
If you are looking for skin just surf the internet. If you are looking for a worthwhile movie - THIS IS NOT IT!

v
Vrouk
Aug 15, 2017

I feel embarassed admitting that I watch this thing. Not for the nudity or the awkward quasi-softcore sex scenes but rather how awful it is. It's a film that has nothing to say, other than it should have stayed just a book. In fact, it feels like a sequel written by a random fan... I bet some fanfiction based on the first book would be far superior than this dreary, uninspired trainwreck of a film. There's going to be a third one?! Bad writing, bad direction, bad acting... Probably the only thing good on the film was the craft services. It makes Showgirls look like Citizen Kane.

n
nidus
Jul 27, 2017

It looks to me that I'm the only one that loves this movie. My opinion is about the exact opposite of other reviewers. I thought Dakota Johnson did a great job of acting and the whole thing was totally interesting and exciting. Casting was excellent -- always good to see Max Martini in an understated role like this. He is such a credible tough guy. If you like a love story, this trilogy nails it.

As the character Christian explains it, it's not dominance but Sadism, and for those that haven't spent 34 years in N. California, plain vanilla movies may be more suitable.

s
saturn
Jul 18, 2017

This was the worst movie ever. It should be titled 50 shades of garbadge.

b
britprincess1ajax
Jul 03, 2017

While I was pleasantly surprised with the first instalment of the FIFTY SHADES film trilogy, I did not get the same vibe off this latest film. FIFTY SHADES DARKER wasn't darker at all. It was boring and felt completely pointless. There was no plot, no momentum, and nothing of consequence. It was so dull and monotonous. Not worth it -- I do not recommend FIFTY SHADES DARKER.

s
stlblues2016
Jun 28, 2017

What a boring movie ,just like the first one. There are some sick people out there that gets into this kind of stuff. So we are going to have a third movie and I know everybody can't wait for this one!.

c
coffeejr
Jun 21, 2017

The first movie had better music and a "buzz" behind it which motivated me to give it a shot. I love Jamie Dornan, which brought me back (The Fall anyone?) to 50 Shades Darker but the leads have zero chemistry. Please tell me that it's just a rumour about a third movie!!
I am betting Charlie Hunnam is REALLY glad he passed on this movie trilogy.....

r
Ron@Ottawa
Jun 16, 2017

Have to say I picked up this title for the steamy stuff. But even in this department the film fails to deliver. I am just glad I did not pay for a ticket to watch it. It's success as a book/film series totally baffles me.

w
Womanonfire
Jun 15, 2017

This movie was too long, at least it felt really long to me. Usually when a movie loses my interest half way through it can feel really long for me.

In reality, the movie wasn't long at all, it was just boring and it dragged. Wasn't really impressed with the acting and didn't buy the chemistry between the two leads at all. In fact, I get a sense that they may not like each other in real life.

Either way, I got what I wanted from this movie which was to be entertained and even if I found the movie boring, I clearly didn't find it boring enough to stop it half way through.

s
saleng
May 20, 2017

What a boring soft porn movie. Dakota Johnson just can't act on this movie. unlike the first movie

View All Comments

Age

Add Age Suitability

b
blue_camel_450
Jun 04, 2017

blue_camel_450 thinks this title is suitable for between the ages of 12 and 44

Summary

Add a Summary

There are no summaries for this title yet.

Notices

Add Notices

There are no notices for this title yet.

Quotes

Add a Quote

There are no quotes for this title yet.

Explore Further

Browse by Call Number

Recommendations

Subject Headings

  Loading...

Find it at DCL

  Loading...
[]
[]
To Top